Skip to content Skip to navigation

The demand for high-value senior care

April 18, 2017
by Amy Stewart, RN, DNS-MT, RAC-MT, QCP-MT
| Reprints

The recent political transitions are making for many unknowns and insecurities in healthcare’s future. With the fate of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and other long-term care quality initiatives hanging in the balance, providers are left questioning whether all the requirements they’ve been working so diligently to fulfill are here to stay. Rest assured, no matter which way the ACA and other contentious healthcare policies fall, payers have seen providers improve quality and efficiencies, and they won’t settle for less anymore. The focus on high-value, cost-effective healthcare accompanied by alternative payment models is here to stay, and staying ahead of the curve will be vital for providers’ success.

Although the ACA drives quality-focused oversight programs, the law’s passage in 2010 was certainly not the first time quality initiatives were embraced. CMS implemented Nursing Home Compare in 1998, and in 2008 added the Five-Star Quality Rating System. Nursing Home Compare publicly shares each nursing home’s last three annual surveys, survey complaint investigation activities, 16 out of the 24 Quality Measures counted in Five-Star rating calculations and the facility’s Five-Star ratings. Five-Star rating calculations are based on health inspection findings, staffing levels and Quality Measures. These public reporting initiatives focus on quality of care to enable consumers, payers and referral sources to make assumptions about the value of care provided in a specific facility and about whether or not to choose the facility.

The Improving Medicare Post-Acute Care Transformation (IMPACT) Act, passed in 2014, requires the reporting of standardized patient-assessment data from post-acute care facilities to help improve communication among the various care providers, improving resident outcomes. Programs like IMPACT and the additional programs derived from them, like the SNF Quality Reporting Program (QRP), have driven the lion’s share of reporting requirements for facilities over the past two decades. Over the same period, payers have been progressively linking more and more payments to positive outcome measures, a trend that will continue into the future.

Nurse leaders can take proactive steps to help their organizations provide the highest quality of care on a day-to-day basis and stand out as a high-value care partner.

Review patient procedures with quality in mind.

Not only should patient procedures be kept up to date and relevant, but their impact on the quality of care and their cost effectiveness also should be evaluated. For example, facility leaders might choose to save money by using a lower-cost wound dressing such as gauze throughout the facility. Gauze initially costs less than foam dressings, but the gauze may require daily changes, whereas a foam dressing can be left in place for three or more days, requiring less staff time. Furthermore, the foam dressing keeps the wound at an optimum temperature to promote healing, requiring less nursing time and ultimately costing the facility less money and improving resident outcomes. Nurse leaders should keep the bigger picture in mind when considering how facility protocols can offer higher value and improve resident outcomes.

Train staff to prevent missing information and avoid frustration.

What happens when your facility receives an admission with no documentation about the new resident’s influenza or pneumococcal vaccine status? Your team asks the resident and the family, but the resident doesn’t remember and the family doesn’t know. If it’s really difficult to get documentation in a situation like this, staff may be more likely to give up quickly. Similarly, what happens if a resident arrives with a Stage 2 pressure ulcer that was previously a Stage 3 or 4 but without documentation indicating this? If the pressure ulcer returns to a Stage 4, but your team has already coded a Stage 2, your facility reports will show worsening of a pressure ulcer, negatively impacting Quality Measures. Staff should be trained on the vital importance of collecting all the proper information and supporting documentation (including from the hospital) to ensure that these data points are included in the resident record.

Identify and mitigate patient-centered risk as quickly as possible.

As of November 28, 2017, CMS will require the implementation of a baseline care plan within 48 hours, which should be used to identify an effective person-centered care upon admission, based on professional standards of quality care. Using this care plan to monitor immediately for potential risks specific to the resident will support early identification of problems and person-centered interventions that can reduce emergency room visits and re-hospitalizations. For example, while assessing for a pressure ulcer risk, if the resident shows a risk for nutrition but no other areas (i.e., activity, mobility, sensory perception, moisture, friction, or shearing), you will want to address the nutrition aspect by ensuring the resident has adequate caloric, fluid and protein intake.

Stay on top of vaccinations.

Showcase your prevention skills through influenza and pneumococcal vaccination Quality Measures. Make sure that you are on top of vaccination schedules and are administering immunizations appropriately in accordance with a policy that follows the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines, and ensure that vaccinations are accurately captured on MDS assessments.

Pages

Memory Care Forum - Focus: Skilled Clinical Care

Get the latest information and other valuable topics at this two-day forum bringing together administrators, policy advocates, educators, researchers, gerontologists, and clinical professionals working to improve quality of care and lifestyle, operational efficiency, and resident safety and satisfaction for seniors and the professionals who care for them.

Philadelphia, PA | San Diego, CA
Topics